Environmental lawsuit

Jonathan_TurleyIn 1994, five unnamed civilian contractors and the widows of contractors Walter Kasza and Robert Frost sued the USAF and the United States Environmental Protection Agency. Their suit, in which they were represented by George Washington University law professor Jonathan Turley, alleged they had been present when large quantities of unknown chemicals had been burned in open pits and trenches at Groom. Biopsies taken from the complainants were analyzed by Rutgers University biochemists, who found high levels of dioxin,thumbnailCAH1EDCW dibenzofuran, and trichloroethylene in their body fat. The complainants alleged they had sustained skin, liver, and respiratory injuries due to their work at Groom, and that this had contributed to the deaths of Frost and Kasza. The suit sought compensation for the injuries they had sustained, claiming the USAF had illegally handled toxic materials, and that the EPA had failed in its duty to enforce the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (which governs handling of dangerous materials). They also sought detailed information about the chemicals to which they were allegedly exposed, hoping this would facilitate the medical treatment of survivors. Congressman Lee H. Hamilton, former chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, told 60 Minutes reporter Leslie Stahl, "The Air Force is classifying all information about Area 51 in order to protect themselves from a lawsuit."

Citing the State Secrets Privilege, the government petitioned trial judge U.S. District Judge Philip Pro (of the United States District Court for the District of Nevada in Las Vegas) to disallow disclosure of classified documents or examination of secret witnesses, alleging this would expose classified information and threaten national security. When Judge Pro rejected the government's argument, President Bill Clinton issued a Presidential Determination, exempting what it called, "The Air Force's Operating Location Near Groom Lake, Nevada" from environmental disclosure laws. Consequently, Pro dismissed the suit due to lack of evidence. Turley appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, on the grounds that the government was abusing its power to classify material. Secretary of the Air Force Sheila E. Widnall filed a brief which stated that disclosures of the materials present in the air and water near Groom "can reveal military operational capabilities or the nature and scope of classified operations." The Ninth Circuit rejected Turley's appeal, and the U.S. Supreme Court refused to hear it, putting an end to the complainants' case.

The President continues to annually issue a determination continuing the Groom exception. This, and similarly tacit wording used in other government communications, is the only formal recognition the U.S. Government has ever given that Groom Lake is more than simply another part of the Nellis complex.

An unclassified memo on the safe handling of F117 material was posted on an Air Force website in 2005. This discussed the same materials for which the complainants had requested information (information the government had claimed was classified). The memo was removed shortly after journalists became aware of it.

Clinton's Area 51 Exemption

Below is the full text of the order signed by President Clinton exempting Area 51 (Groom Lake) from releasing its environmental reports to the public.

Note: this order must be renewed annually and was superseded by #96-54 in 1996.

THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON

September 29, 1995

                                   Presidential Determination
No. 95-45

MEMORANDUM FOR THE ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION AGENCY
THE SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE

SUBJECT: Presidential Determination on Classified
Information Concerning the Air Force's Operating
Location Near Groom Lake, Nevada


I find that it is in the paramount interest of the United States
to exempt the United States Air Force's operating location near
Groom Lake, Nevada (the subject of litigation in Kasza v. Browner
(D. Nev. CV-S-94-795-PMP) and Frost v. Perry (D. Nev. CV-S-94-
714-PMP)) from any applicable requirement for the disclosure to
unauthorized persons of classified information concerning that
operating location. Therefore, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 6961(a),
I hereby exempt the Air Force's operating location near Groom
Lake, Nevada from any Federal, State, interstate or local
provision respecting control and abatement of solid waste or
hazardous waste disposal that would require the disclosure of
classified information concerning that operating location to any
unauthorized person. This exemption shall be effective for the
full one-year statutory period.

Nothing herein is intended to: (a) imply that in the absence of
such a Presidential exemption, the Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act (RCRA) or any other provision of law permits or
requires disclosure of classified information to unauthorized
persons; or (b) limit the applicability or enforcement of any
requirement of law applicable to the Air Force's operating
location near Groom Lake, Nevada, except those provisions, if
any, that would require the disclosure of classified information.

The Secretary of the Air Force is authorized and directed to
publish this Determination in the Federal Register.

[Signed]
William J. Clinton

George Washington University
Office of University Relations
Washington, DC 20052

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
October 12, 1995

Attempted Exemption Of Secret Air Force Base By President Clinton Is Challenged As Military Violates Commitment Previously Made To Federal Court

On Friday, October 13, 1995, workers at a secret air force base will ask a federal court In Las Vegas to strike down an attempted exemption of the base from requirements of the hazardous waste laws. President Clinton's personal exemption of the base was made public on October 3, 1995 in an unprecedented act under the environmental laws. (The only other exemption was a global exemption in handling the Haitian boat crisis).

President Clinton's exemption occurred after months of argument by the government that they would not issue such an exemption and that a court order would violate the President's constitutional authority as Commander and Chief. Instead the military argued that it can simply classify all information on violations at the facility as a state secret, including evidence of possible crimes committed at the base. in a thirty-page opinion, Judge Philip Pro ruled that the national security arguments of the government were "illusory" and "unpersuasive." Judge Pro gave the military until October 2, 1995, to declassify the information demanded by Plaintiffs or secure a personal exemption from President Clinton. In filing the exemption, the Justice Department simultaneously asked the Court to reverse its earlier order requiring 1he exemption.

On Friday, the workers in this litigation will file a motion to strike the exemption as legally invalid under the federal law. Their counsel, Jonathan Turley dismisses the exemption as "little more than the military's rejected legal theory placed on a piece of paper and signed by the President." He continues:

This document does not resemble anything recognizable in the statute. The President can exempt the facility from 'requirements' under the Act, not their results. Exempting the military from releasing information that they classify would create a unilateral, self-exempting authority in military officials and permit the total concealment of evidence of environmental violations. If the President wishes to exempt this facility from its responsibility under environmental laws, he must take responsibility for this decision and specifically state the requirements that he is waiving. Otherwise, the President would create a type of stealth law to be used by the military whenever it decides to conceal violations from the public.

Professor Jonathan Turley, a George Washington University law professor and Director of the Environmental Crimes Project, represents workers at a secret Air Force base in two cases charging that the military has committed environmental crimes at the base. Various workers have died of cancer and other workers have become ill from a variety of complications, including a rare painful skin disease linked to the burning of hazardous wastes.

President Clinton's exemption was made public on the same day that he announced compensation for the victims of prior military abuses in radiation experiments and production. Without mentioning his exemption decision, the President stated:

Those who led the government when these decisions were made are no longer here to take responsibility for what they did, They are not here to apologize to the survivors, though family members and the communities whose lives wore darkened by the shadow of the atom and these choices. There are circumstances where compensation is appropriate as a matter of ethics and principle, I am committed to seeing to it that the United States of America lives up to its responsibility. Our greatness is measured not only in how we so frequently do right, but also how we act when we have done the wrong thing, how we confront our mistakes, make our apologies, and take action.

This decision came after a Commission showed how the military had misused secrecy laws to hide evidence of environmental and safety violations. In the Area 51 case, the military has claimed the existence of "jet fuel," "paint," "car batteries" and other generic items at the air base to be top secret matters and incapable of disclosure without "risking American lives." The contradiction of these two acts on the same day was not lost on the workers or their counsel. Professor Turley noted:

The hypocrisy of President Clinton's statements was both painful and shocking for these families. The criminal acts committed at Area 51 may have caused the death of at least two workers and certainly injured a greater number of workers, President Clinton has confronted his mistakes by personally exempting the military from releasing any information to the widows or the Federal Courts. It appears that President Clinton's concern over "how we act when we have done the wrong thing" extends to the mistakes of his predecessors alone. It is one thing to allow the military to engage in this type of criminal conduct at the cost of their own workers, it is another to claim moral superiority by compensating the military's victims of the 1940s while actively opposing their victims in the 1990s. The Area 51 victims do not want compensation, they want justice and will clearly not find it In the Oval office.

In another development, October 11, 1995, was the day that the military had agreed to publicly list the base for the first time on a federal facilities docket. In asking for a dismissal of the worker's claims, the military assured the Court that the facility would be publicly listed on the docket by this date. They have now violated this commitment and this violation will be raised with the Court in Friday's filling. "Repeatedly in this litigation, the military demanded immediate dismissal on the basis of statements or promises that were later proven to be false," Turley stated. "This is only the latest example of a litigation policy to say and do anything to avoid legal responsibility for these acts."


Las Vegas Review-Journal
Tuesday, August 04, 1998

WORKERS' ATTORNEY APPEALS TO SUPREME COURT IN AREA 51 CASE

By Tony Batt
Donrey Washington Bureau

          WASHINGTON -- The attorney for workers at Area 51, the
classified base in the Nellis Air Force Range, has filed an appeal
with the U.S. Supreme Court to reverse a court order protecting
information about the base.

          Jonathan Turley, a George Washington University law professor,
claims two workers died from exposure to toxic waste burning at the
base, 90 miles north of Las Vegas.

          "What happened was an outrage, and we will remain active in
pursuing justice," Turley said Monday.

          Turley filed the appeal July 27, asking the Supreme Court to
overturn a decision by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San
Francisco.

          The appeals court, in a 3-0 decision on Jan. 8, upheld the Air
Force's claim that disclosure of the information Turley seeks could
endanger national security and violate a 1995 order by President
Clinton.

          The appeals court ruled that five current and former workers at
the base and the widows of the two dead workers, all represented by
Turley, are not entitled to learn whether hazardous substances exist
at Area 51 or how they are handled. The court also ruled that the
results of a federal inspection of the base and even its name could
not be disclosed. Turley's request for a rehearing was rejected on
April 24.

          Justice Department spokeswoman Chris Watney said Monday the
department has not been notified of Turley's appeal to the Supreme
Court but would have 45 days to respond "and we will."

          The Supreme Court is out of session until October. When the
justices return, it should take about six weeks for them to decide
whether to consider the Area 51 case.

          Turley acknowledged his appeal is a long shot, noting that few
cases are accepted by the Supreme Court. But he said the issues in the
Area 51 lawsuit should interest some justices.

          "The 9th Circuit's ruling seemed to create new law in national
security as well as environmental law that contradicts past Supreme
Court rulings," he said. "This case has many of the elements the court
looks for. The question is whether a sufficient number of justices
will be interested."

          Turley has raised his national profile in recent weeks by
appearing on several television talk shows to criticize Clinton's
actions in response to allegations of sexual misconduct with former
White House intern Monica Lewinsky.

          "If the president had shown a fraction of the concern for the
workers (at Area 51) that he has shown for his own case, this case
would have ended long ago," Turley said.

          The White House referred a phone call about Turley's comments to
the National Security Council, which did not respond.

As reported today in the Las Vegas newspapers, the U.S. Supreme
Court has declined to hear the appeal of the Groom Lake workers
who claim hazardous waste exposure.   This is effectively the
end of their case.


SUPREME COURT   DECLINES TO HEAR THE CASE OF THE FORMER AREA 51 WORKERS

Tuesday, November 03, 1998
High court keeps Groom Lake secret
Workers from the military base known as Area 51 are not entitled to
know about hazardous materials there.

By Keith Rogers, Review-Journal

          The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday turned away an appeal by
workers at the Air Force's classified Groom Lake base -- known as Area
51 -- who claimed they were exposed to toxic fumes from hazardous
waste burned in open trenches.

          The court's decision not to hear the case upholds a ruling in
January by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco that
the workers and widows are not entitled to learn what hazardous
substances existed or how they were handled at the base, located near
the dry Groom Lake bed 90 miles north of Las Vegas.

          The court, without comment, let stand rulings in the
government's favor despite claims by workers that toxic materials,
including coatings used for radar-evading Stealth aircraft, were
burned routinely in open trenches in violation of federal law.




COMPENSATION CLAIM: Area 51 burning revealed

Ex-officer says he oversaw destruction of stealth coatings

For 17 years, Fred Dunham never spoke publicly about where he used to work or what he once did at the place he calls "the location."

Dunham says he feared he would be arrested and sent to jail for breaching a national security oath he took in 1981 when he was hired by EG&G Special Projects.

But last week he went on the record about the nine years he spent as a security officer at the classified Air Force installation, 90 miles north of Las Vegas, telling a Department of Labor hearing representative how he supervised burning of poisonous stealth coatings in large open pits.

That, he said, is the root of his ongoing health problems, including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. And Dunham said he doesn't want his chance at compensation to be lost because he can't talk about his work.

Like hundreds of former Nevada Test Site workers, Dunham is seeking compensation under an act that gives $150,000 to Energy Department workers and contractor workers who can prove their sometimes fatal illnesses are linked to exposure to toxic materials where they worked during the Cold War era.

"Under no circumstances was this material to be destroyed in an open pit environment. It was supposed to be destroyed in an EPA certified incinerator," Dunham, 56, told Labor Department hearing agent Sandra Vicens-Pecenka about the disposal process.

At the time, EG&G Special Projects was a subcontractor for the Department of Energy and Department of Defense.

Dunham wore an Energy Department badge that allowed him access to "the location."

"I left there because I was medically de-accessed by the military site physician because of my breathing problems," he said before the hearing. "I had coughed so hard that I separated the ribs on this side of my chest."

Dunham said the Air Force "has absolutely denied that anything occurred at the location. I am the individual who signed for the 100 gallons of diesel fuel, and I observed the pit being ignited. That was my job."

He didn't have to spell out for Vicens-Pecenka the place where this occurred, the 38,400-acre installation along the dry Groom Lake bed where for decades such high-tech U.S. aircraft as the U-2 Dragon Lady and SR-71 Blackbird spy planes and the F-117A Nighthawk stealth fighter jet have been tested.

Among the documents Dunham submitted was a March 2 letter to him from Sen. Harry Reid, D-Nev., that names the location. "Thank you for contacting me about federal compensation for Area 51 workers," the letter begins.

In addition, Dunham presented Vicens-Pecenka with a letter from his doctor stating that he has chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and that he was in excellent health "prior to working at that particular site."

Another document, listed as Exhibit No. 2 in Dunham's case, is an unclassified May 19, 2005 "Safety Supplement" for emergency responders that warns about the danger of inhaling "hazardous byproducts of burning wreckage" of F-117A stealth fighter jets.

In one instance in New Mexico, a firefighter died after responding to burning wreckage of a stealth fighter.

After the Aug. 28 hearing, Dunham described how he was exposed to dioxins and furans from the open-pit burning of 55-gallon drums of resins, solvents and hardening compounds, stuff he said Lockheed Corp. used to coat its radar-evading stealth aircraft.

Kenworth tractor-trailer rigs from Lockheed's Southern California facilities in Burbank and Palmdale "would come in late Tuesday," he said.

"Then Wednesday morning, I would meet them at the burn pit and the semi was opened and the material was put in the pit," Dunham said. "I was there to supervise the unloading of the material and make sure no other subcontractors came close to the pit."

After the drums of stealth coatings were dumped in a trench, other classified material such as technical manuals were put on top along with wood.

"Then I would make a call to POL, short for petroleum, oil and lubricants. Then the truck would arrive, and I would sign for 100 gallons of diesel fuel, which was sprayed upon the pit," he said. "Then, at approximately 3:30 p.m., I would make a call to the fire department and they would put a flare in the pit.

"As the fire burned through the night, these drums would explode and a big white cloud of smoke would whiff out through the area. You could wake up the next day, and the whole valley would look like L.A. smog," Dunham said.

"If you were standing there doing your job, you basically inhaled smoke for six hours. My wife would ask, 'Why does your uniform smell so noxious?' I would button my lip and say, 'Just wash the uniforms.' I wasn't at liberty to discuss it," he said.

Inhaling the smoke from 100 yards away affected Dunham's metabolism, causing him to gain weight. "I gained 80 pounds in a year," he said.

Before he worked at Area 51, Dunham weighed 196 pounds. "I used to play handball and racquetball. ... I was buff. I was a nonsmoker. I've never smoked in my life. Now I can't even blow out a candle on a birthday cake."

Years later, his body swelled to as much as 435 pounds, but he has since lost weight and was down to 380 pounds last week.

The burning of stealth coatings in open pits at Area 51 was the subject of a pair of decade-long lawsuits in which former workers and widows of former workers contended the practice amounted to criminal violations of Environmental Protection Agency laws.

In April 2003, a 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals panel found the Justice Department did not abuse national security when information was struck from court documents in the 1994 cases.

The same panel ruled in 1998 that the plaintiffs, who were clients of George Washington University environmental law professor Jonathan Turley, were not entitled to learn what hazardous materials were used at Groom Lake or how they were disposed. That same year, the U.S. Supreme Court refused to hear an appeal of the ruling sought by Turley.

Central to the cases are presidential memorandums to the chiefs of the EPA and the Air Force, saying it was of "paramount interest" to exempt the Groom Lake installation from adhering to federal, state, interstate or local laws regarding solid waste or hazardous waste if classified information would be disclosed.

Officials for the Air Force and EG&G Special Projects wouldn't comment on operations at Area 51 or acknowledge that open pit burning of stealth coatings occurred there.

Lockheed employees who became ill from inhaling fumes from stealth coatings at the Southern California facilities have since been compensated by the company.

And, ingredients of the secret material is no longer a secret to some foreign nations after an F-117A crashed in Yugoslavia in 1999 and parts of the wreckage were recovered by enemy forces.

When Dunham first applied for compensation under the Energy Employees Occupational Illness program, the Labor Department denied his claim because he didn't submit complete medical records.

But after last week's hearing, Vicens-Pecenka told him that because of the medical evidence and the revelations about his employment at Area 51, "you have a pretty good chance."

Dunham said that is encouraging, but he wants to see secret military installations comply with state and federal environmental laws so other workers and wildlife in those remote areas are protected.

Recently, 71 wild horses died from high levels of nitrate they drank from a watering hole at the Tonopah Test Range.

Investigators from state and federal agencies are still trying to pinpoint the source of the contamination. But a former worker, Kevin Dye, said the deaths could have been prevented if nitrogen compounds used for de-icing planes were properly disposed in a catch basin instead of being allowed to run off into the desert untreated.

Dante Pistone, a spokesman for the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection, said Friday that representatives from the division's Bureau of Water Pollution Control made a trip to the site at the Tonopah Test Range. Their preliminary findings "seem to eliminate the airstrip or de-icing materials as possible sources of the nitrates."

The de-icing agents currently used by the Air Force don't contain nitrogen compounds, and the pond near where the horses died is uphill from the airfield, some five miles away, Pistone said in an e-mail Friday.

But Dunham said the source of contamination from past years is no mystery to him.

He said urea, a crystalline substance high in nitrogen, was used at the Groom Lake installation when he worked there, and, like at the Tonopah Test Range, the contamination accumulated over years in the dry lake bed.

"When it got cold up there, they had a tank of it to de-ice airplanes, and they gave us a sack of it to throw on the ramp where passengers exit," Dunham said.

"What it did is eat the surface off the concrete. There was no control over it. They're supposed to have gutters and things where the stuff rolls into a sanitation facility."



Area 51 workers in twilight zone

Test site cohorts get compensation; they don't


A former Energy Department contract employee has been denied an illness compensation claim solely because he worked at Area 51, though federal officials years ago told base contract workers they would receive the same consideration as Nevada Test Site workers who became ill.

And that makes Fred Dunham think the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program should be scrapped for a more fair system that follows a course Congress intended.

"I would terminate the whole lot of them and replace them with people who want to do the job at hand. Congress has tasked them with a job to do, and they have turned their back on Congress and the citizens," said Dunham, a 57-year-old Las Vegas resident.

He has chronic obstructive pulmonary disease that he blames on inhaling toxic, dioxin-laden fumes while he worked for EG&G Special Projects at the government's secret installation along the dry Groom Lake bed.

Labor Department officials don't dispute that his disease is linked to toxic materials from his workplace. But they denied his claim because the place where he worked was outside the boundary of the Nevada Test Site, according to the Feb. 29 denial letter signed by Angelino P. Patueo, a senior claims examiner for the Labor Department in Seattle.

Dunham appealed the decision on March 7, but hasn't heard back from the Labor Department.

The place known as Area 51, adjacent to the test site and 90 miles north of Las Vegas, is where the nation's high-tech aircraft have been tested against foreign radar systems and where nuclear weapons safety tests have been conducted.

To reach his security post there during the 1980s, Dunham wore a Department of Energy badge worked on Department of Energy land at an installation that was operated by the Department of Defense under a memorandum of understanding from the Department of Energy that dates back to 1958, when the land was withdrawn from public use by DOE's forerunner, the Atomic Energy Commission.

Dunham said his paychecks came from money funneled to his employer, EG&G Special Projects, through the test site's prime contractor at the time, Reynolds Electrical & Engineering Co. Inc., also known as REECo.

It wasn't until President Clinton signed the Military Lands Withdrawal Act of 1999 that the 38,400-acre rectangle that contains Area 51 was transferred from DOE to the Air Force.

According to a "sense of Congress" document that the Labor Department is supposed to follow in awarding at least $150,000 in compensation for workers who became ill from exposure to toxic or radioactive materials, the place where Dunham worked fits the definition of an Energy Department facility.

"The term 'Department of Energy facility' means any building, structure, or premise including the grounds upon which such building, structure or premise is located in which operations are, or have been, conducted by, or on behalf of, the Department of Energy," the law reads.

So, are Area 51 workers covered by the compensation act or not?

The Review-Journal posed that question April 23 to the Department of Labor's public affairs staff in Washington, D.C. Last week, the response from spokesman Loren Smith has been that the question was referred to the Department of Energy and was in "a holding pattern."

In an e-mail Thursday regarding the Area 51 issue, Smith wrote: "We are in contact with the Department of Energy, and they have advised us that we should expect a response in the near future."

Dunham doesn't understand why he has been denied and another former EG&G contract employee, Lori Marie Fox, was awarded $187,500 in compensation this year, even though she worked outside the boundaries of the test site as an Energy Department contractor. She worked at the Tonopah Test Range.

"I didn't think I would ever see any money out of this," said Fox, whose bout with lung disease is linked to exposure to toxic substances including asbestos and chemicals from an inventory she monitored.

Like Dunham, she too inhaled fumes from the open-pit burning of plastic materials.

"The situation at Groom Lake was the same as it was at Tonopah," she said.

Former test site worker John Funk, chairman of the nonprofit advocacy group Atomic Veterans and Victims of America Inc., has alerted the Labor Department to dozens of flaws in the test site's profile, on which case workers rely to assess claims.

Among those he noted in an April 19 letter to John Vance, Labor Department regulations policy branch chief for the compensation division, is that the profile "fails to address employees who worked in Area 51."

"All of the personnel working in Area 51 were hired by REECo and were processed through Mercury (the test site town) and they wore DOE badges. ... They came and went to Area 51 through the Mercury gate just like everyone else, their paychecks ... were funded by DOE appropriation funds," Funk's letter reads.

Funk also sought compensation for various cancers, including a type of bone marrow cancer caused by exposure to benzene or radioactive materials. He has battled the Labor Department system for years and was denied, but after an appeal was recommended this year for compensation for his exposure to radionuclide-laced lithium hydride, benzene, cyanide, arsenic and mercuric chloride.

Asked if he believes he will receive compensation, Funk said only when he sees the check in his hand.

"I've been here before," he said.






Former Area 51 workers eligible for aid

Downwinder designation OK'd


WASHINGTON -- Former Department of Energy and contractor employees who worked at the top secret Area 51 base now are eligible to seek health payments available to nuclear weapons workers who got sick from their jobs, a top federal official said Wednesday.

The announcement by Shelby Hallmark, director of the Office of Worker Compensation in the Labor Department, cleared an obstacle that has prevented some former Nevada workers from getting help to battle job-related cancers and other serious illnesses that showed up years after they completed careers at weapons sites.

Hallmark said the Labor Department has designated Area 51, the 60-square mile guarded installation on the northeast border of the Nevada Test Site, as part of the test site for purposes of the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation program.

Initial estimates varied widely of how many people might be eligible to gain payments, from less than a hundred to several thousand.

Darwin Morgan, a test site spokesman, said only about 25 to 100 people may be covered. While the Energy Department controlled Area 51 for much of its history, the secret development of military aircraft and weaponry at the site was performed by Defense Department contractors who are not covered by the compensation law, Morgan said.

But John Funk, a Las Vegas advocate and former test site carpenter, said it was clear to workers employed by Bechtel Nevada, Reynolds Electrical and Engineering Company, EG&G Energy Measurements Inc., and Wackenhut Services Inc., among other firms, that they were there at the behest of DOE and its predecessor agencies.

Funk said test site employees routinely were sent "over the hill" to the secret base. He said as many as 2,000 former workers may be covered.

"You can call them what you want, but they were all DOE workers," said Funk, chairman of the nonprofit Atomic Veterans and Victims of America.

Labor Department officials could not estimate the number of potentially covered workers. Sen. Harry Reid, D-Nev., is attempting to clarify the eligibility question, aides said.

As for designating Area 51 part of the health program, Reid said, "This is very good news."

"I have been working for this for a long time now because these workers deserve a fair shake," Reid said. "Clearly, there are still some questions that need to be answered and I will continue to work to have those concerns addressed."

Hallmark said in an interview that examiners will identify all claims that have been filed to determine if they may be affected by the program expansion. Claims that have been denied may be reopened.

He suggested former workers and their families who believe they may be affected should contact the Las Vegas Resource Center that processes claims under the energy workers compensation act. The toll free number is 866-697-0841.

"We also will conduct other outreach efforts to get this information to all affected claimants and to all former NTS employees and their families who have yet to file a claim but may be affected by this change," Hallmark said.

Hallmark cautioned that the Department of Health and Human Services, which works with Labor to administer the program, may need to take further actions as well.

The health department may need to update its Nevada Test Site profile that provides the basis for weighing claims. It also may need to determine whether certain workers fall into "special exposure cohort" categories that would make them eligible for streamlined claims processing.

The compensation law covers the Nevada Test Site and dozens of other Energy Department and contractor facilities where workers took part in nuclear weapons programs and could have been exposed to radiation and toxics.

Former workers who contracted cancers or other diseases linked to exposures to radiation, silica or beryllium are eligible for $150,000 lump sum payments and medical expenses. Another part of the program provides worker compensation-style payments for job-related illnesses.

The Labor Department declared eligibility for DOE workers who were at Area 51 for the period between January 1, 1958 through December 31, 1999. Those were the years DOE controlled the site that is roughly 90 miles northwest of Las Vegas.

A land swap at the end of 1999 gave control to the Air Force.


The following picutre is from a 1968 Satellite view of Area 51.   You can clearly see the black smoke from something burning in the burn pits:

1968toxicwaste




 

     
  Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. -Carl Sagan  
  Site Map